Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 34.1 to 29.6.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index33.231.3
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.8 (#279)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Coding11491093

Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 20.8 (#231)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Hard Prompts11381087

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 33.0 (#208)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Math11591152

Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 28.6 (#244)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Expert11311051

Multilingual Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 25.9 (#282)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Non-English10681013
LMArena Chinese11391033
LMArena Russian10631019
LMArena German—1031
LMArena Japanese—954
LMArena Korean—880

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 54.1 (#282)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Instruction Following11161058

Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 31.7 (#277)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Longer Query11551042

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024: 29.6 (#294)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024
LMArena Text11271080
LMArena Creative Writing11161045
LMArena Multi-Turn10991049

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct June 2024 has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper