Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 54.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 33.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1149 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1138 |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1159 |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1131 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1116 |
Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1155 |
Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1099 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.