Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Molmo 2 8b
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Molmo 2 8b in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Molmo 2 8b leads 49.4 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1287 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual Molmo 2 8b leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1276 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Molmo 2 8b leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | — |
Writing & Preference Molmo 2 8b leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Molmo 2 8b?
Molmo 2 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Molmo 2 8b share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.