Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Longcat Flash Chat

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 34.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderIBMMeituan
Noometry Index33.242.1
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding11491471

Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts11381440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math11591442

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert11311454

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English10681404
LMArena Chinese11391465
LMArena Russian10631395
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following11161411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query11551425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text11271427
LMArena Creative Writing11161388
LMArena Multi-Turn10991418

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper