Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 22.6.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Longcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderMeituanAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.133.4
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding14711276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14401251
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math14421251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert14541221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English14041205
LMArena Chinese14651222
LMArena Russian13951228
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Japanese1373—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14111223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query14251251

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text14271230
LMArena Creative Writing13881174
LMArena Multi-Turn14181222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper