Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

32.6

Rank #243 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 47.4 to 34.3.
  • Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderIBMTencent
Noometry Index32.637.2
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding11491270

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11381264

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math11591274

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11311248

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English10681262
LMArena Chinese11381319
LMArena Russian10631258

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following11161245

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query11551301

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text11271274
LMArena Creative Writing11161242
LMArena Multi-Turn10991275

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper