Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 47.2 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1270 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1264 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1274 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1248 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1245 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.