Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.7 to 34.1.
  • Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderIBMTencent
Noometry Index33.238.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding11491307

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts11381286

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math11591281

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert11311276

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English10681265
LMArena Chinese11391346
LMArena Russian10631266

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following11161277

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query11551341

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text11271288
LMArena Creative Writing11161264
LMArena Multi-Turn10991284

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper