Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 38.2 to 22.6.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.633.4
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1231

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding13071276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861251
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math12811251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert12761221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English12651205
LMArena Chinese13461222
LMArena Russian12661228

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12771223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query13411251

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text12881230
LMArena Creative Writing12641174
LMArena Multi-Turn12841222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper