Model comparison
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 15B
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#266); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 15B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.0 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 31.1 | 37.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.0
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Complete | 35.4% | 38.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1113 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1092 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 104.61 |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1143 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1087 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1063 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1060 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1088 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1122 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1096 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1063 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 15B?
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#266); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?
StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and StarCoder 2 15B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.