Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs StarCoder 2 15B
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 15B leads 36.6 to 29.9.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding StarCoder 2 15B leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 37.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105 |
| WinoGrande | — | 64.3% |
Math Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 57.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 47.2% |
| MMLU | — | 64.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), StarCoder 2 15B: —
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | StarCoder 2 15B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than StarCoder 2 15B?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has enough public results to be ranked (#268); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?
StarCoder 2 15B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and StarCoder 2 15B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.