Model comparison
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.2 to 31.2.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1113 | 1318 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 35.4% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1092 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1143 | 1315 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1087 | 1272 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1037 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1063 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1060 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1088 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1122 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1096 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1071 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1063 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.