Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.832.7
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding10251210

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10471208

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math10721208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10631160
LMArena Chinese—1192
LMArena Russian—1187

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10601186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query9981194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text10981218
LMArena Creative Writing10911199
LMArena Multi-Turn10581221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper