Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 48.5 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.640.0
Released—2026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding11121375
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts10921337

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math11431359

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert10871356

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English10371295
LMArena Chinese10631359
LMArena Russian10601253
LMArena French—1366
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1238
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following10881318

Long Context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query11221314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text10961327
LMArena Creative Writing10711254
LMArena Multi-Turn10631328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper