Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 48.5 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
ProviderNVIDIANVIDIA
Noometry Index31.840.0
Released—2026-08-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Coding10251375

Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts10471337

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Math10721359

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Expert—1356

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Non-English10631295
LMArena Chinese—1359
LMArena French—1366
LMArena German—1282
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1238
LMArena Russian—1253
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following10601318

Long Context Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Longer Query9981314

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatNemotron 3.5 Lightning
LMArena Text10981327
LMArena Creative Writing10911254
LMArena Multi-Turn10581328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper