Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Mixtral 8x22B

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 29.6 to 15.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 35.4% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and 50.2% for Mixtral 8x22B.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index31.627.1
Released—2024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%40.6%
LMArena Coding11121166
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%50.2%
WeirdML—3.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts10921150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math11431184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert10871113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Mixtral 8x22B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English10371128
LMArena Chinese10631116
LMArena Russian10601158
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Mixtral 8x22B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following10881147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query11221144

Writing & Preference Mixtral 8x22B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text10961162
LMArena Creative Writing10711141
LMArena Multi-Turn10631130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.7 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Mixtral 8x22B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper