Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.1

Rank #327 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 30.3 to 8.7.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Gemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index27.131.1
Released2023-12-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding11081113
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11091092
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.97—

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math11321143
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert10591087
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11381037
LMArena Chinese11241063
LMArena Russian11861060
LMArena French1144—
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—
LMArena Spanish1118—

Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11141088

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11321122

Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text11491096
LMArena Creative Writing11301071
LMArena Multi-Turn11391063

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper