Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 31.6.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderNVIDIAXiaomi
Noometry Index31.848.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding10251504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10471482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math10721468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert—1501

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English10631434
LMArena Chinese—1511
LMArena French—1475
LMArena Russian—1409
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10601463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query9981463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text10981455
LMArena Creative Writing10911400
LMArena Multi-Turn10581451

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper