Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 20.5 to 14.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.827.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding10901093
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11171111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert10641045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331021
LMArena Chinese10701021
LMArena Russian10451022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10701044

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text10801073
LMArena Creative Writing10461037
LMArena Multi-Turn10531018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.3 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper