Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Mistral
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 28.4 to 16.3.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 29.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311), Mistral: 33.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1162 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |
Reasoning Mistral leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234), Mistral: 21.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1149 |
Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215), Mistral: 20.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1180 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238), Mistral: 16.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
Multilingual Mistral leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273), Mistral: 33.0 (#249)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1109 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1168 |
| LMArena French | — | 1179 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |
Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279), Mistral: 52.9 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
Long Context Mistral leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263), Mistral: 35.0 (#240)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1071 | 1154 |
Writing & Preference Mistral leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287), Mistral: 37.2 (#255)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Mistral?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Mistral better for coding?
Mistral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.2 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.