Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Palm 2

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 27.0 to 20.9.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Palm 2 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
ProviderIBMGoogle
Noometry Index30.830.0
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Coding1090994
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts10731005

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Math11171049

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Expert1064—

Multilingual Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Non-English1033916
LMArena Chinese1070887
LMArena Russian1045—

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following10561010

Long Context Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Longer Query10701010

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPalm 2
LMArena Text10801027
LMArena Creative Writing1046991
LMArena Multi-Turn1053994

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Palm 2?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Palm 2 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.3 vs 29.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper