Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.1

Rank #249 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 46.7 to 35.8.
  • gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Large Vision specifications
gpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index32.137.0
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 37.1 (#185), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding13071307
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.2 (#146), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

gpt-oss-20b: 18.8 (#251), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts12741257
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.81—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#93), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math13171269
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#186), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert12581250
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.4 (#192), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English12691236
LMArena Chinese13111289
LMArena Russian12791243
LMArena German1249—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1239—
LMArena Spanish1267—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads

gpt-oss-20b: 62.0 (#235), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following12361250
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#203), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query12511279

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.8 (#260), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text12881263
LMArena Creative Writing12011250
LMArena Multi-Turn12681253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 37.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper