Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs gpt-oss-20b

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 6 categories and gpt-oss-20b in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 49.8 to 35.5.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and gpt-oss-20b specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
ProviderDeepSeekOpenAI
Noometry Index37.632.5
Released2024-09-062025-08-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.018
Output $ / M tokens—$0.09
Results tracked2234

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding gpt-oss-20b leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Coding13091306
Aider Polyglot17.8%—
SciCode—34.4%
WeirdML—40.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
ALE-Bench—566.05
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
Terminal-Bench—3.4%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Hard Prompts12891274
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.2%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—4%
DTBench—68%
LMCA—14.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.82

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Math12881317
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—65.3%
Omni-MATH—56.5%

Knowledge Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Expert12661258
GPQA Diamond—60.8%
MMLU-Pro—74%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%

Multilingual Too close to call

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Non-English12731268
LMArena Chinese13181314
LMArena German12581255
LMArena Japanese12281244
LMArena Korean12091236
LMArena Russian12891278
LMArena Spanish12481267
LMArena French1289—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Instruction Following12801236
IFEval—73.2%

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Longer Query13011250

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)gpt-oss-20b
LMArena Text12941287
LMArena Creative Writing12851201
LMArena Multi-Turn12971268
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—666
WildBench—73.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than gpt-oss-20b?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or gpt-oss-20b better for coding?

gpt-oss-20b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and gpt-oss-20b share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and gpt-oss-20b has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper