Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

39.4

Rank #168 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 36.3.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index61.839.4
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4516

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14471347
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14181322
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14021305
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14391308
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13851275
LMArena Chinese14051304
LMArena French14101328
LMArena German13901282
LMArena Korean13411206
LMArena Russian14011268
LMArena Spanish13841336
LMArena Japanese1385—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14121299

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14111312

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

BenchmarkGPT-6 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13951311
LMArena Creative Writing13781264
LMArena Multi-Turn14121309
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper