Model comparison
GPT-6 Sol vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 14.8.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 29.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 28% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Sol or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.