Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 38.7.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Hunyuan T1 20250711 specifications
GPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index61.842.5
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14471390
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14181399
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14021414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14391395
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Too close to call

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English13851395
LMArena Chinese14051425
LMArena Korean13411406
LMArena Russian14011385
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14121374

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14111384

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text13951401
LMArena Creative Writing13781392
LMArena Multi-Turn14121393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper