Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Google

59.5

Rank #13 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 64.7 to 27.3.

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index59.541.8
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 56.4 (#17), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding15121389
DeepSWE73.8%—
FrontierCode41.2%—
CursorBench39.6%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
FrontierSWE19.6%—
SciCode56.6%—
ALE-Bench1,270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.3 (#22), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents64.3%—
GDP.pdf23.4%—
Vending-Bench 25,094—

Reasoning Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 64.7 (#13), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts15061399
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
CritPt18.3%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
Mystery Game Puzzles47%—
DTBench95.7%—
LMCA52.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.13—

Math Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 65.2 (#22), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math15281414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)68.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 422%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench48%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 74.9 (#2), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert15291395
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam44.5%—
SimpleQA Verified69.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 40.9 (#33), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1312—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly31.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 57.9 (#5), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14861395
LMArena Chinese15471424
LMArena Korean14791403
LMArena Russian15071384
LMArena French1502—
LMArena German1470—
LMArena Japanese1505—
LMArena Spanish1492—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 78.2 (#11), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14891375

Long Context Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 46.2 (#23), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query15061384

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.8 Flash leads

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 72.1 (#16), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14941401
LMArena Creative Writing14851391
LMArena Multi-Turn15031393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1748—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.8 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.8 Flash has 46 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper