Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 35.8.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
GPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index61.838.6
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14471307
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14181286
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14021281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14391276
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English13851265
LMArena Chinese14051346
LMArena Russian14011266
LMArena French1410—
LMArena German1390—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14121277

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14111341

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text13951288
LMArena Creative Writing13781264
LMArena Multi-Turn14121284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper