Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 33.1.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index60.538.0
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1307
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1286
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1281

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1276

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English—1265
LMArena Chinese—1346
LMArena Russian—1266

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following—1277

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query—1342

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text—1288
LMArena Creative Writing—1264
LMArena Multi-Turn—1284

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper