Model comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Mixtral 8x7B
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 18.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 90.5% for GPT-6 Luna and 30.6% for Mixtral 8x7B.
- GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B.
- GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 32K.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 53.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 32K |
| Max output | 128K | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1439 | 1126 |
| DeepSWE | 66.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | — |
| SciCode | 54.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,577 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 44.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 23% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | 1115 |
| DTBench | 90.1% | 49.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.28 | 118.47 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.7% | — |
| CritPt | 19.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| LMCA | 44.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1416 | 1147 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 78.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 56.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 64% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 30.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1088 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1217 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 44.2% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1386 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | 1420 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1369 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1369 | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 968 |
| LMArena Russian | 1394 | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1393 | 1111 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1109 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1391 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1363 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | 1115 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Mixtral 8x7B?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Mixtral 8x7B?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x7B lists at $0.70 and $0.70.
Is GPT-6 Luna or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 32K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Mixtral 8x7B share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.