Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Magistral Medium

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

45.1

Rank #65 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Luna leads 31.7 to 8.7.
  • GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Magistral Medium specifications
GPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
ProviderOpenAIMistral AI
Noometry Index45.134.8
Released2026-09-222025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$5
Results tracked1822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24), Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Coding14481319
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1583—
SciCode—39.2%

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68), Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts14151267
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
CritPt—0.3%

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140), Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Math13961249

Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110), Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert14581222

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27), Magistral Medium: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
Furniture Assembly44.2%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111), Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13901232
LMArena Chinese14251225
LMArena Russian13921224
LMArena Spanish14161269
LMArena French—1268
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1176
LMArena Korean—1125

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85), Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following14141254

Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14171295

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115), Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaMagistral Medium
LMArena Text13921255
LMArena Creative Writing13571245
LMArena Multi-Turn14001275

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Magistral Medium?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.1 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Magistral Medium?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is GPT-6 Luna or Magistral Medium better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Magistral Medium share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 18 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper