Model comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3 14B
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Luna scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 38.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for GPT-6 Luna and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 53.3 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 54.6% | 31.6% |
| DeepSWE | 66.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1581 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1439 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,577 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 44.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
| GDP.pdf | 23% | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 19.4% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 31% | 4% |
| DTBench | 90.1% | 64% |
| LMCA | 44.5% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.28 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1411 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
Math GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 66.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 78.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 56.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 64% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1416 | — |
Knowledge GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.5% | 63.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1217 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 31.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 44.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1386 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1433 | — |
| LMArena French | 1420 | — |
| LMArena German | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1394 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1393 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | — |
Long Context GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1396 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Qwen3 14B?
GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3 14B?
GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.
Is GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 14B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.