Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#188); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 41.4.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1443 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1439 |
| LMArena French | — | 1422 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1404 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#188); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.