Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Solar Pro4
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 79× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
UpstageSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 39.8.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 524K |
| Max output | 272K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Solar Pro4?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 79× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Solar Pro4 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.