Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Longcat Flash Chat
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 38.9 to 19.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 76.8% for GPT-5 Pro and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | 43.9% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1440 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1411 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Longcat Flash Chat?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (44.0 vs 43.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Longcat Flash Chat share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.