Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 79× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 Pro leads 48.5 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 60.4% for GPT-5 Pro and 37% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 205K.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 205K |
| Max output | 272K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | 37% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | 145.85 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.7 costs 79× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Is GPT-5 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.