Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

46.1

Rank #66 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5 leads 66.0 to 31.6.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
GLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index46.131.8
Released2026-02-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked459

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#52), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding14611025
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 31.1 (#71), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 27.6 (#116), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts14521047
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.83—
ForecastBench61—

Math GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 46.4 (#71), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math14401072
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5: 52.3 (#64), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—
LMArena Expert1454—

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.7 (#58), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English14301063
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1445—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1423—
LMArena Russian1436—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.2 (#67), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14281060

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.7 (#60), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1446998
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.0 (#38), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text14461098
LMArena Creative Writing14391091
LMArena Multi-Turn14561058
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper