Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 34.2.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.