Model comparison

GPT-5 Nano vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5 Nano OpenAI

33.5

Rank #241 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Nano scores higher in 1 category and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.3 to 39.1.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5 Nano and Step 3 specifications
GPT-5 NanoStep 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index33.540.5
Released2025-08-07—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked4917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Coding13511367
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)34.8%—
WeirdML38.1%—
ALE-Bench718.67—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
Terminal-Bench21.8%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard51.5%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark62.2%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts13281355
ARC-AGI-22.6%—
ARC-AGI-120.7%—
Chess Puzzles27%—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA7.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.38—
ForecastBench59.1—

Math Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Knowledge Too close to call

GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Expert13211333
GPQA Diamond69.4%—
SimpleQA Verified11.7%—
MMLU-Pro77.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.5%—
GPQA (HELM)67.9%—

Multimodal Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Vision11591177
VPCT37.2%—

Multilingual Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Non-English13131327
LMArena Chinese13561397
LMArena German13271371
LMArena Korean12691269
LMArena Russian12961331
LMArena Spanish13601371
LMArena Japanese1226—

Instruction Following GPT-5 Nano leads

GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following13061332
IFEval93.2%—

Long Context Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Longer Query13121326
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoStep 3
LMArena Text13201350
LMArena Creative Writing12491321
LMArena Multi-Turn13111341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing705—
WildBench80.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 Nano better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5 Nano or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 33.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Nano and Step 3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Nano has 49 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper