Model comparison
GPT-5 Mini vs Ministral 8B
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Mini scores higher in 9 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Mini leads 45.6 to 12.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 97.8% for GPT-5 Mini and 14.9% for Ministral 8B.
- Ministral 8B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $2 for GPT-5 Mini.
- GPT-5 Mini accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 28.2 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146), Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1406 | 1202 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 59.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 39.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 799.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.38 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70), Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.5% | 11.1% |
| Terminal-Bench | 34.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -31.18 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168), Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1191 |
| DTBench | 80.5% | 45.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 54.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 8.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 10% | — |
| LMCA | 34.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.52 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69), Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | 14.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86), Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75% | 27.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1170 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 75.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85), Ministral 8B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1202 | — |
| VPCT | 40.2% | — |
Multilingual GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137), Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1385 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1362 | 1195 |
| LMArena French | 1386 | — |
| LMArena German | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1355 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46), Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1161 |
| IFEval | 92.7% | — |
Long Context GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1212 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148), Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1373 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1325 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1363 | 1166 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1313 | — |
| WildBench | 85.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Mini better than Ministral 8B?
GPT-5 Mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 8B costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Mini's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Mini or Ministral 8B?
Ministral 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Mini lists at $0.25 and $2.
Is GPT-5 Mini or Ministral 8B better for coding?
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Mini does, with 400K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Mini and Ministral 8B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.