Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Ministral 8B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

27.8

Rank #321 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Ministral 8B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 39.8.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Ministral 8B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
ProviderAmazonMistral AI
Noometry Index41.427.8
Released—2024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.10
Results tracked917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Coding13711202

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—11.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561191
DTBench—45.7%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Math—1188
MATH Level 5—14.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
GPQA Diamond—27.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1170

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Non-English13411165
LMArena Chinese13451193
LMArena Russian—1195

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Instruction Following13161161

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Longer Query13341212

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Ministral 8B
LMArena Text13651191
LMArena Creative Writing13071175
LMArena Multi-Turn13541166

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Ministral 8B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Ministral 8B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper