Model comparison
GPT-5-Codex vs Hunyuan Large Vision
GPT-5-Codex and Hunyuan Large Vision score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5-Codex leads 30.0 to 23.8.
Side by side
| GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-09-15 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5-Codex leads
GPT-5-Codex: 41.9 (#100), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 54.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1307 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: 30.8 (#66), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 44.3% | — |
Reasoning GPT-5-Codex leads
GPT-5-Codex: 30.0 (#80), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1257 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1269 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1250 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1243 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1250 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5-Codex: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | GPT-5-Codex | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1253 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5-Codex better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
GPT-5-Codex and Hunyuan Large Vision score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GPT-5-Codex or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
GPT-5-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5-Codex and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5-Codex has 3 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.