Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs MiniMax-M2.7

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 46.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M2.7 specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index37.637.7
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1330

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding13081454
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts12571422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math12681420
ProofBench—3%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert12521444
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), MiniMax-M2.7: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English12361382
LMArena Chinese12871441
LMArena Russian12431383
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following12511405

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query12801419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text12631405
LMArena Creative Writing12481354
LMArena Multi-Turn12541412

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper