Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Palm 2

GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI

54.6

Rank #30 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.6 Luna leads 77.7 to 30.8.

Side by side

GPT-5.6 Luna and Palm 2 specifications
GPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
ProviderOpenAIGoogle
Noometry Index54.630.0
Released2026-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked5210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 54.5 (#28), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Coding1466994
DeepSWE67.2%—
FrontierCode39.8%—
CursorBench35.9%—
LMArena WebDev1519—
SciCode53.6%—
WeirdML60.9%—
ALE-Bench1,667—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 34.4 (#45), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
APEX-Agents43%—
BALROG45.6%—
GDP.pdf22.7%—
Vending-Bench 24,095—

Reasoning GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 47.6 (#43), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14511005
ARC-AGI-259.5%—
SimpleBench46.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark49.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)69.4%—
ARC-AGI-188%—
CritPt20.6%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench89.1%—
LMCA48.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench61.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.39—

Math GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 77.7 (#14), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Math14581049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)82.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 461%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench60%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 58.5 (#34), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
GPQA Diamond91.6%—
SimpleQA Verified41%—
LMArena Expert1478—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.6 Luna: 42.7 (#28), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Vision1258—
Blueprint-Bench 222.6%—
Furniture Assembly42.5%—
LMArena Document1457—

Multilingual GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 52.8 (#78), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Non-English1417916
LMArena Chinese1470887
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1411—
LMArena Korean1415—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 75.6 (#57), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14371010

Long Context GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 43.9 (#82), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Longer Query14361010

Writing & Preference GPT-5.6 Luna leads

GPT-5.6 Luna: 68.0 (#29), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 LunaPalm 2
LMArena Text14311027
LMArena Creative Writing1396991
LMArena Multi-Turn1434994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1829—
EQ-Bench 41156—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Palm 2?

GPT-5.6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.6 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.6 Luna or Palm 2 better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.5 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.6 Luna and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.6 Luna has 52 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper