Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Palm 2

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 65.5 to 25.6.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Palm 2 specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index54.330.0
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.66—
Output $ / M tokens$1.98—
Results tracked4810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Coding1470994
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14611005
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31—
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Math14551049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—
ProofBench50%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
GPQA Diamond91.7%—
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—
LMArena Expert1464—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Non-English1439916
LMArena Chinese1486887
LMArena French1472—
LMArena German1458—
LMArena Japanese1445—
LMArena Korean1447—
LMArena Russian1453—
LMArena Spanish1458—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14481010

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Longer Query14581010
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProPalm 2
LMArena Text14511027
LMArena Creative Writing1446991
LMArena Multi-Turn1467994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Palm 2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Palm 2 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper