Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 16.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 8.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 38% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.