Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen Turbo
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 771× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Turbo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 6.1% for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
- GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 6.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 41.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 771× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.