Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 84.0 to 36.1.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.07 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.