Model comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has enough public results to be ranked (#179); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 37.9.
Side by side
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 2 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads
GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6.1 Sol: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has enough public results to be ranked (#179); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.