Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Instant vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 50.5 to 26.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 68.1% for GPT-5.5 Instant and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.745.3
Released2026-05-052026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
SciCode48.6%45.5%
LMArena Coding14331473
FrontierCode—10.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Instant: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
CritPt0%9.1%
Chess Puzzles12%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14261460
Epoch Capabilities Index142.52147.37
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26.3%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.1%93.3%
LMArena Math14201466
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond82.5%87.9%
LMArena Expert14091467

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12501279
LMArena Document14031444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14171445
LMArena Chinese14561510
LMArena French14281473
LMArena German14111471
LMArena Japanese14081413
LMArena Korean13921415
LMArena Russian14311457
LMArena Spanish14291457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14061440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14221455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 InstantQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14191455
LMArena Creative Writing14191439
LMArena Multi-Turn14331460

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Instant better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.5 Instant or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Instant and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Instant has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper